Drawing for RHEOLOGICS

USPTO serial 76330019

RHEOLOGICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AXILBUND, MELVIN
Law office
INTENT TO USE UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RHEOLOGICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paul J. Kennedy

PAUL J KENNEDY PEPPER HAMILTON LLPEIGHTEENTH AND ARCH STS3000 TWO LOGAN SQPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2799

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009scanning capillary viscometers for measuring the viscosity of circulating unadulterated blood for research useACTIVE—
010scanning capillary viscometers for measuring the viscosity of circulating unadulterated blood for treatment useACTIVE—
042providing product development services for third parties in the field of pharmaceuticals and diagnostics for the treatment and diagnosis of human diseaseACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 7, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 7, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 19, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 29, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 29, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 7, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 29, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 29, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 29, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 28, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 20, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 1, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 29, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 29, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 26, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 29, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 6, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 17, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 22, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 18, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 18, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 22, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 22, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance