USPTO serial 76330089
MOVEITONLINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELENKER, ESTHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MOVEITONLINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Calgary Alberta, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas J. Moore
THOMAS J MOORE BACON & THOMAS, PLLC625 SLATERS LN FOURTH FLALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-1176UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR THE BUYING AND SELLING OF TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, PROVISION OF TRANSPORTATION SERVICE COST QUOTATIONS, BUSINESS PERFORMANCE MONITORING, PROJECT MANAGEMENT, SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT, RESOURCE PLANNING AND RESOURCE ALLOCATION, IN THE FIELD OF BUSINESS TO BUSINESS E-COMMERCE; DATABASE SOFTWARE USED FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF TRANSPORTATION COST AND ORDER INFORMATION OFFERED VIA THE INTERNET | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING A WEB SITE FOR THE BUYING AND SELLING OF TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, THE MATCHING OF LOAD REQUIREMENTS AND TRANSPORTATION CAPACITY, THE POSTING OF LOAD REQUIREMENTS, AND PROVIDING TRANSPORTATION SERVICE COST QUOTATIONS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 12, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 1, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 27, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 21, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |