USPTO serial 76330180
HIGHWAY 101 MANUFACTURING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PINO, BRIAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HIGHWAY 101 MANUFACTURING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Seoul, 135-729, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Victor N. Balancia
VICTOR N BALANCIA PENNIE EDMONDS1155 AVE OF THE AMERICAS FL 17NEW YORK, NY 10036-2711UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software, namely, for use in middleware and integration solution applications and Internet-based service functions; computer operating programs and computer programs, namely, for use in middleware and integration solution applications and Internet-based service functions; microprocessors that control middleware and integration solution applications and Internet-based service functions; magnetic computer tapes containing software for use in middleware and integration solution applications and Internet-based service functions; computer storage equipment, namely, computer hard drives for use with middleware and integration solution applications and Internet-based service functions; CD-ROMs, namely software recorded on CD-ROMs for use in middleware and integration solution applications and Internet-based service functions; prerecorded audio and video tapes featuring computer software for use in middleware and integration solution applications and Internet-based service functions | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 24, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 12, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |