USPTO serial 76330246
REAL MEN GO DEEP!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COGGINS, ROBERT H
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with REAL MEN GO DEEP!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Roseville, CA
Roseville, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen L. Anderson
ALAN SLEADDPO BOX 148ROSEVILLE, CA 95678UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Paper goods and printed matter, namely, bumper stickers, decals, rub-on tattoos, paper banners, posters, photographs, football game catalogs, and flyers relating to the sport of football | ABANDONED | Jun 2, 1996 |
| 025 | Clothing and headgear, namely, t-shirts, sport shirts, polo shirts, tank tops, shorts, sweatpants, jackets, caps, hats and bandannas | ABANDONED | Aug 1, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 14, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 14, 2003 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 15, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 11, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 12, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 11, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 3, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |