USPTO serial 76330458
MEDIPLAST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, RONALD G
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MEDIPLAST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
200 39 MALMO, SE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark I. Peroff, Esq.
MARK I PEROFF ESQ TRADEMARK & PATENT COUNSELORS OF ET AL915 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10010UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | MEDICAL APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS IN THE FORM OF DISPOSABLE PRODUCTS, NOT WOUND DRESSINGS OR PLASTERS, FOR MEDICAL TREATMENTS OF EAR, NOSE AND THROAT DISEASES; MEDICAL APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS IN THE FORM OF DISPOSABLE PRODUCTS, NOT WOUND DRESSINGS OR PLASTERS, FOR TREATMENTS WITHIN ANAESTHESIA/INTENSIVE CARE AND SURGICAL OPERATIONS CARE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2004 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 2, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 17, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 18, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 10, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 21, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 18, 2002 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jul 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 16, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 18, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |