Drawing for WIRELESS VILLAGE

USPTO serial 76330494

WIRELESS VILLAGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PINO, BRIAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WIRELESS VILLAGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert S. Weisbein

ROBERT S WEISBEIN DARBY & DARBY PC805 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer hardware and software for use in apparatuses for recording, processing, sending, transmission, storage and reproduction of sound, data and images by mobile phone, computers and personal digital assistants; computer software for use in database management, telephones, cordless, wireless and satellite telephones, dedicated network computer terminals for telecommunications, facsimiles and communicators; electronic systems and apparatus, namely, scramblers, descramblers, encoders and decoders for scrambling, descrambling, encoding and decoding of voice, data, image and video transmissions; base stations for a cellular telephone network, transmission equipment for use in communications, namely, servers, routers and modemsACTIVE—
038electronic, electric and digital delivery of voice, data, images, photographs, signals and video via global and local information and communication networks; providing multiple user access to a global and local information and communication networks; providing telecommunications connections to global and local information and communication networks; cellular telephone services; providing on-line electronic bulletin boards for transmission of messages among computer and mobile phone users concerning telecommunications; providing information in the field of telecommunications and wireless technology via the InternetACTIVE—
042consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; technical support, namely, monitoring of telecommunications network systems and supporting mobile phone users by troubleshooting hardware and software problems; database development services; information network security services; research and development in the field of information networks; computer software design for others; interface design; database design; design and development of digital telecommunications systems for public and private networks; providing consultation in the field of telecommunications and wireless technologyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 26, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 26, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 5, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 30, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 27, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 27, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 2, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 27, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 27, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 27, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 29, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 4, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 15, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 3, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 21, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 28, 200244DDSEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED—
Oct 28, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 28, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 8, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 1, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 20, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 20, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 25, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 26, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance