USPTO serial 76330520
HARSCO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2976774Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 26, 2005
- Examiner
- YARD, JOHN S
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HARSCO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
HARSCO TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
Fairmont, MN
HARSCO TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
Fairmont, MN
HARSCO TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
Fairmont, MN
FAIRMONT, MN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rebecca A. Finkenbinder
Rebecca A. Finkenbinder McNees Wallace Nurick LLC100 Pine StreetHarrisburg, PA 17108UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Mechanical blenders for industrial and pharmaceutical use, cranes, winches, hoists and buckets for drag lines and hoists, earth movers and bulldozers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 31, 2004 |
| 040 | Metal reclamation services; manufacturing of steel castings, forgings, cylinders for transporting of gases, scaffolding and forms, metals grills, steel pipe fittings and fabricated metal products to the order and specification of others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 31, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HARSCO TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by HARSCO TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by HARSCO TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by HARSCO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named HARSCO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 21, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 18, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 4, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2004 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 12, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 16, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 29, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 10, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 15, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 23, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 3, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 16, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 15, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 4, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 2, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |