USPTO serial 76330527
EXPO21XX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TOLPIN, BRETT
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EXPO21XX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Hanover Lower Saxony, DE
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | ELECTRONIC RETAILING SERVICES VIA THE COMPUTER FEATURING ALL SERVICES FOR TRADE AND INDUSTRY AND ALL FORMS OF MANUFACTURED GOODS PROMOTING GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS BY PREPARING AND PLACING ADVERTISEMENT IN ELECTRONIC MEDIA AND TRADE FAIRS ACCESSED THROUGH A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK PROVIDING INFORMATION ABOUT THE GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS VIA THE GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK [INTERNET] | ACTIVE | Mar 24, 2000 |
| 042 | COMPUTER PROJECT MANAGEMENT SERVICES COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY-- CREATING AND MAINTAINING WEB SITES FOR OTHERS PROVIDING DATABASES FEATURING GENERAL AND LOCAL NEWS AND INFORMATION OF INTEREST TO SPECIFIC GEOGRAPHIC AREAS PROVIDING ONLINE MAGAZINES JOURNALS AND PERIODICALS IN THE FIELD OF INDUSTRY TRADE AND COMMERCE CREATING INDEXES OF INFORMATION, SITES AND OTHER RESOURCES AVAILABLE ON COMPUTER NETWORKS | ACTIVE | Mar 24, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2003 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 12, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |