Drawing for PURE MONARCA CORN OIL

USPTO serial 76330764

PURE MONARCA CORN OIL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PURE MONARCA CORN OIL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

EDWIN H. KEUSEY

EDWIN H KEUSEY KEUSEY, TUTUNJIAN & BITETTO20 CROSSWAYS PARK N STE 210WOODBURY, NY 11797UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Vegetable oils, namely, corn oilACTIVEJun 11, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 8, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 7, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 7, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 14, 2006EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Apr 6, 2006GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 6, 2006CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Feb 17, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 10, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 12, 2005RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Dec 12, 2005CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Nov 25, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 23, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 23, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 22, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 8, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 8, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 9, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 9, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 4, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 29, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 29, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 26, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 16, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 26, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 22, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 22, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 24, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 10, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance