Drawing for HYNETICS

USPTO serial 76330779

HYNETICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HYNETICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DANA L. TANGREN

DANA L TANGREN WORKMAN, NYDEGGER & SEELEY1000 EAGLE GATE TWR60 E S TEMPLESALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037MAINTENANCE OF HYDRATION SYSTEMS FOR USE IN PRODUCING CULTURE MEDIA, BUFFERS, AND REAGENTSACTIVE—
040CONTRACT MANUFACTURING, NAMELY, OPERATING HYDRATION SYSTEMS FOR USE IN PRODUCING CULTURE MEDIA, BUFFERS, AND REAGENTSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 29, 2004MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 29, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 5, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jan 27, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 27, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 27, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 13, 2004DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 10, 2003DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Nov 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 16, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 16, 2003FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Feb 11, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 19, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 30, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 4, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 22, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 21, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 22, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 5, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 25, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 1, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 18, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance