USPTO serial 76330972
ENSEQUENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2860741Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 6, 2004
- Examiner
- BENMAMAN, ALICE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ENSEQUENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kenneth M. Kwartler
Kenneth M. Kwartler Ken Kwartler Law Office5300 Meadows RoadSuite 200Lake Oswego, OR 97035Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR USE IN CONNECTION WITH THE CREATION, DELIVERY AND PLAYBACK OF INTERACTIVE TELEVISION CONTENT; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT AND DATABASE INTEGRATION | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 10, 2002 |
| 042 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 10, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ensequence, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Ensequence, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Ensequence, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ENSEQUENCE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 29, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 29, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 29, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 6, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 26, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 8, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 5, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 7, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 15, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 24, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 27, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 31, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 11, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 24, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 1, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 29, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |