Drawing for SPORTSBETTING.COM

USPTO serial 76331011

SPORTSBETTING.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KEATING, MICHAEL P
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SPORTSBETTING.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven A. Gibson

STEVEN A GIBSON SANTORO DRIGGS WALCH KEARNEY ET AL400 S 4TH ST ST 3RD FLLAS VEGAS, NV 89101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Provision of casino games on and through a global computer network wherein there are no actual monetary wagers; provision of contests and sweepstakes on and through a global computer network; providing a web site on and through a global computer network featuring information in the fields of gaming, athletic competition and entertainmentACTIVENov 2, 1999

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 7, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 8, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 6, 2005ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 6, 2005EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jan 4, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jan 4, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jan 4, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Nov 24, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 29, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 29, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 22, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2004CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jun 15, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 15, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 15, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 25, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Nov 12, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 12, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 12, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 11, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 13, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 10, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 11, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 10, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 21, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 21, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 7, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 31, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance