USPTO serial 76331079
OVERTIME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AWRICH, ELLEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OVERTIME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Mississauga, Ontario, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electrochemical cells, batteries and battery packs; rechargeable electrochemical cells, batteries and battery packs; rechargers and charging circuits for rechargeable electrochemical cells, batteries and battery packs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 9, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 28, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |