USPTO serial 76331276
HIVISION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 19, 2006
- Examiner
- SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with HIVISION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $1,097*
Plus Government fees of $1,950
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
HIRSCHMANN ELECTRONICS GMBH & CO. KG
72654 Neckartenzlingen, DE
Other trademarks owned by HIRSCHMANN ELECTRONICS GMBH & CO. KG
HIRSCHMANN ELECTRONICS GMBH & CO. KG
72654 Neckartenzlingen, DE
Other trademarks owned by HIRSCHMANN ELECTRONICS GMBH & CO. KG
HIRSCHMANN ELECTRONICS GMBH & CO. KG
72654 Neckartenzlingen, DE
Other trademarks owned by HIRSCHMANN ELECTRONICS GMBH & CO. KG
HIRSCHMANN AUTOMATION AND CONTROL GMBH
NECKARTENZLINGEN, DE
Other trademarks owned by HIRSCHMANN AUTOMATION AND CONTROL GMBH
NECKARTENZLINGEN, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan Myers
Jonathan Myers LUCAS & MERCANTI, LLP30 BROAD STREET21st FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10004Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | NETWORK MANAGEMENT, NAMELY, INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF NETWORK SYSTEMS | ACTIVE | Oct 31, 2001 |
| 042 | ADMINISTRATION OF NETWORK SYSTEMS, NAMELY, THE INTEGRATION OF COMPUTER SYSTEMS AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND DATA NETWORKS; TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND NETWORK DESIGN FOR OTHERS AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT FOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND DATA NETWORKS; MONITORING THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS OR DATA SYSTEMS OF OTHERS FOR TECHNICAL PURPOSES, NAMELY, FOR ERROR DETECTION AND REMOVAL; AND PROVIDING BACK-UP COMPUTER PROGRAMS AND FACILITIES IN THE FIELD OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS | ACTIVE | Oct 31, 2001 |
| 045 | ELECTRONIC MONITORING OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND DATA SYSTEMS FOR SECURITY PURPOSES | ACTIVE | Oct 31, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HIRSCHMANN ELECTRONICS GMBH & CO. KG
- Other trademarks owned by HIRSCHMANN ELECTRONICS GMBH & CO. KG
- Other trademarks owned by HIRSCHMANN ELECTRONICS GMBH & CO. KG
- Other trademarks owned by HIRSCHMANN AUTOMATION AND CONTROL GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by HIRSCHMANN ELECTRONICS GMBH
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named HIVISION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2021 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 22, 2021 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 30, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2017 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 30, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 30, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 22, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 8, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 5, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 9, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 17, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 3, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 14, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 13, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 1, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2004 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Aug 31, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 25, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 2, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 19, 2004 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 18, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 17, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 22, 2003 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Aug 14, 2003 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 1, 2003 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Mar 29, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 4, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 14, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 27, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 22, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 1, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |