USPTO serial 76331392
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ted Davis
TED DAVIS KILPATRICK STOCKTON, LLP1100 PEACHTREE ST STE 2800ATLANTA, GA 30309-4530UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer Software for use in establishing the proficiency of product experts or sales agents, identifying potential customers on a company's website, matching potential customers to product experts or sales agents, initiating contact between the customer and expert, and facilitating real-time communication and interaction between the customer and expert via the participants' web browser and telephone for purposes of conducting business transactions and providing information or assistance to potential customers | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 2003 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2003 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 2, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 2, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 3, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |