Drawing for PROFICIENT

USPTO serial 76331392

PROFICIENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PROFICIENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ted Davis

TED DAVIS KILPATRICK STOCKTON, LLP1100 PEACHTREE ST STE 2800ATLANTA, GA 30309-4530UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer Software for use in establishing the proficiency of product experts or sales agents, identifying potential customers on a company's website, matching potential customers to product experts or sales agents, initiating contact between the customer and expert, and facilitating real-time communication and interaction between the customer and expert via the participants' web browser and telephone for purposes of conducting business transactions and providing information or assistance to potential customersACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 10, 2003ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Jan 6, 2003ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN
Nov 12, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 12, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 9, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 2, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 2, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 2, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 3, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 1, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 22, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance