USPTO serial 76331424
INSTASCREEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 28, 2003
- Examiner
- CLARK, GLENN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with INSTASCREEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Lake Forest, CA
Lake Forest, CA
Lake Forest, CA
INVERNESS MEDICAL SWITZERLAND GMBH
ZUG, CH
Other trademarks owned by INVERNESS MEDICAL SWITZERLAND GMBH
ZUG, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
EDWARD R. WILLIAMS, JR.
EDWARD R WILLIAMS JR APOGENT TECHNOLOGIES INC30 PENHALLOW ST STE 300PORTSMOUTH, NH 03801-3816UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | drug screening kit comprising reagent strips for testing for drugs in urine | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 30, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Forefront Diagnostic, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Forefront Diagnostic, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Forefront Diagnostic, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by INVERNESS MEDICAL SWITZERLAND GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by ALERE SWITZERLAND GMBH
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named INSTASCREEN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 5, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 28, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 5, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 16, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 2, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 16, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 26, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 9, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 9, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 27, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 11, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |