USPTO serial 76331904
AIR COMBAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CAIN, CATHERINE P
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AIR COMBAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Drummondville, Quebec J2B 6V4, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frank Presta
FRANK PRESTA NIXON & VANDERHYE PP.C.1100 N GLEBE RD 8TH FLARLINGTON, VA 22201-4714UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | ATV AND SNOWMOBILE PARTS, NAMELY, WINDSHIELDS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 18, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 18, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 22, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 24, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |