Drawing for THE DEMOCRACY FOUNDATION

USPTO serial 76332037

THE DEMOCRACY FOUNDATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WISEMAN, MICHELLE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE DEMOCRACY FOUNDATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas A. Kain

FRANK J COLUCCI COLUCCI & UMANS218 E 50TH STNEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable electronic publications in the nature of books, magazines and manuals in the field of democracy; computer software for use in disseminating political education regarding democracy; pre-recorded audio and video discs, tapes, cartridges, cassettes and CD Roms, all featuring education on the topic of democracyACTIVE—
016Books, newsletters, magazines, brochures, printed lessons and manuals and instructional and teaching material, all featuring information on the topic of democracyACTIVE—
041Educational services, namely, conducting classes in the field of government; entertainment services, namely, live performances by a musical groupACTIVE—
042Providing legal services in connection with the exercise of direct democracyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 2, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 2, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 17, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 11, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Nov 4, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 7, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 7, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 8, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 14, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 25, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 7, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 6, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 9, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 19, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 19, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 16, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 16, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 7, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance