Drawing for BRICKY

USPTO serial 76332044

BRICKY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LE, KHANH M
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with BRICKY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

PATRICIA A. WILCZYNSKI

PATRICIA A WILCZYNSKI SCULLY, SCOTT, MURPHY & PRESSER400 GARDEN CITY PLZGARDEN CITY, NY 11530-0299UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Hand ToolsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 22, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 22, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 15, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 14, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 14, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Dec 2, 2004PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Jul 8, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 8, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Jul 8, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 5, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 9, 2003CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
Sep 7, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Aug 29, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Aug 26, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 29, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 29, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 26, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 28, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 23, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance