Drawing for SMARTBARKER

USPTO serial 76332152

SMARTBARKER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LE, KHANH M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SMARTBARKER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert J. Carlson

ROBERT J CARLSON5 TH1420 5TH AVE STE 2800SEATTLE, WA 98101-1344

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007log handling forestry machines, namely, log debarkers and replacement parts thereforACTIVEMar 12, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 31, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 12, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 12, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 28, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 28, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 30, 2004EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Nov 3, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 24, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 9, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 13, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 13, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 10, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 11, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 20, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 13, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 13, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 25, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 28, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 23, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance