Drawing for CHARTUS

USPTO serial 76332188

CHARTUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RIRIE, VERNA BETH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHARTUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ELISABETH A. EVERT

DONALD N HUFF DYKEMA GOSSETT PLLCSTE 300 W1300 I ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20005

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Marine propulsion systems, namely; internal combustion engines for boats, stern drives, outboard motors, inboard-outboard drive combinations and trolling motors; cleaning, finishing and polishing machines for bowling lanes and bowling ballsACTIVE—
009Computers, computer peripherals, computer keyboards, computer monitors and computer programs for use in the operation of a bowling establishment for use in bowling game management, score-keeping and management of related business data; motor vehicle and/or engine sensing, monitoring, management and control devices, information display units, and computer programs used therewith for use in sensing, monitoring, and managing, the operating characteristics of motor vehicles and/or enginesACTIVE—
012BoatsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 12, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 12, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 21, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jul 21, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jul 21, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 13, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 13, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 20, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 5, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 30, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 30, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 3, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 3, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 24, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 29, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 29, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 4, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 12, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 23, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 5, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 5, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 15, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 12, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 16, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance