Drawing for EAT THE DAY

USPTO serial 76332237

EAT THE DAY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ZAK, HENRY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EAT THE DAY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brad D. Rose

BRAD D ROSE PRYOR CASHMAN SHERMAN & FLYNN LLP410 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment namely LIVE PERFORMANCES BY A MUSICAL PERFORMER; ENTERTAINMENT NAMELY LIVE PERFORMANCES BY A MUSICAL BAND; ENTERTAINMENT, NAMELY, LIVE MUSICAL CONCERTS; ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING A WEB SITE FEATURING MUSICAL PERFORMANCES, MUSICAL VIDEOS, RELATED FILM CLIPS, PHOTOGRAPHS AND OTHER MULTIMEDIA MATERIALS; ENTERTAINMENT SERVICE, NAMELY, PROVIDING PRERECORDED MUSIC, INFORMATION IN THE FIELD OF MUSIC, COMMENTARY AND ARTICLES ABOUT MUSIC, ALL ONLINE VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; TELEVISION AND RADIO PRODUCTION; TELEVISION SHOW PRODUCTION; DISTRIBUTION OF TELEVISION PROGRAMS FOR OTHERS; PRODUCTION OF CABLE TELEVISION PROGRAMS; ENTERTAINMENT, NAMELY, PRODUCTION OF TELEVISION SHOWS AND PLAYS; ENTERTAINMENT IN THE NATURE OF ON-GOING TELEVISION PROGRAMS FEATURING MUSICAL PERFORMANCES; ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING TELEVISION AND RADIO PROGRAMS FEATURING MUSICAL PERFORMANCES VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, PERSONAL APPEARANCES BY A MUSICIAN; ENTERTAINMENT, NAMELY, A CONTINUING VARIETY SHOW DISTRIBUTED OVER TELEVISION, SATELLITE, AUDIO AND VIDEO MEDIA; PRODUCTION AND DISTRIBUTION OF MOTION PICTURES; MOTION PICTURE SONG PRODUCTION; FILM EDITING; SPECIAL EFFECTS ANIMATION SERVICES FOR FILM AND VIDEOACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 30, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 19, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 19, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 19, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 7, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 18, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 5, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 1, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 25, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 12, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 22, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance