USPTO serial 76332268
NATURA EKOS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3593525Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 24, 2009
- Examiner
- MAYERSCHOFF, GLENN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NATURA EKOS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michele M. Glessner
Michele M. Glessner Alston & Bird LLP101 S. Tryon Street, Suite 4000Charlotte, NC 28280-4000UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | [ COSMETICS; MAKEUP; FOUNDATION MAKEUP; BODY AND FACE POWDER; EYEBROW SHADOW; EYEBROW PENCILS; LIPSTICKS; LIP LINER; EYE LINER; ] SKIN LOTIONS; [ MASCARA, COSMETIC PENCILS; FALSE EYELASHES; PREPARATIONS AND ADHESIVES FOR FALSE EYELASHES; ADHESIVES FOR COSMETICS PURPOSES; ] LOTION FOR TONING AND FIRMING THE SKIN; [ SKIN WHITENING CREAM; SUNSCREEN AND SUN-TANNING PREPARATIONS; HAIR POMADES FOR COSMETICS PURPOSES; PERMANENT WAVE PREPARATIONS; NAIL POLISH AND VARNISH; FALSE NAILS; NAIL CARE PREPARATIONS; HAIR SPRAY AND HAIR STYLING PREPARATIONS; HAIR WAVING LOTIONS; TISSUES IMPREGNATED WITH COSMETIC LOTIONS; MAKE-UP REMOVING PREPARATIONS; BEAUTY MASKS; COSMETIC DYES, INCLUDING HAIR DYES AND HAIR COLORANTS; COTTON STICKS, PUFFS AND SWABS FOR COSMETIC PURPOSES; ] CREAM FOR THE FACE; MILKS FOR COSMETIC PURPOSES; [ BATH SALTS, NOT FOR MEDICAL PURPOSES; BEARD DYES; HAIR COLOR REMOVER; HAIR BLEACH; CAKES OF TOILET SOAPS; FACIAL CLEANSERS AND TONERS, SKIN CLEANSERS AND TONERS; PERFUME; ] TOILET WATER; [ POTPOURRIS; SCENTED WOOD; ] EAU DE COLOGNE; [ BOTANICAL EXTRACTS AND CONCENTRATED PERFUME FOR PERFUME USE; ANTIPERSPIRANTS; PERSONAL DEODORANTS; ] FRAGRANCES FOR PERSONAL USE; ESSENTIAL OILS FOR PERSONAL USE; [ SCENTED OILS TO PRODUCE AROMAS WHEN HEATED; ] BATH OIL; SOAP [ ; DEPILATORY WAX; SHAVING PREPARATIONS AND SHAVING SOAPS; AFTER-SHAVE LOTIONS; SHAMPOOS; MOUTH WASHES, NOT FOR MEDICAL PURPOSES; DENTIFRICES; DEPILATORIES AND DEPILATORY PREPARATIONS ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2019 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 5, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 5, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2015 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2015 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Mar 25, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 23, 2015 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 15, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 6, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 17, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 27, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 27, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 13, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 9, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 22, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 5, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 1, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 15, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 14, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 14, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 22, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 5, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 3, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |