Drawing for Serial No. 76332348

USPTO serial 76332348

Serial No. 76332348

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHARPER JR, SAM
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 76332348?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

HERBERT H. GOODMAN

HERBERT H GOODMAN FRISHAUF HOLTZ GOODMAN LANGER ET AL767 3RD AVE FL 25NEW YORK, NY 10017-2023UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Beer, malt beer, hop extracts for making beer, non-alcoholic beverages, namely, non-alcoholic beer and cocktail mixes, packages drinking waterACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 9, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 2, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 2, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 9, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 8, 2003EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jun 14, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 25, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 20, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 20, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 22, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 22, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance