USPTO serial 76332463
NETERGY MICROELECTRONICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 10, 2003
- Examiner
- COGGINS, ROBERT H
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NETERGY MICROELECTRONICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Netergy Microelectronics, Inc.
Santa Clara, CA
Netergy Microelectronics, Inc.
Santa Clara, CA
Netergy Microelectronics, Inc.
Santa Clara, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert J. Crawford
Robert J. Crawford Crawford Maunu PLLC1150 Northland Drive, Suite 100St. Paul, MN 55120UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer hardware that enables online communications, voice-over-data communications, voice-over-Internet-protocol communications, voice-over-digital-subscriber-line communications; video-over-data communications, video-over-Internet-protocol communications, and video-over-digital-subscriber-line communications, computer software that enables online communications, voice-over-data communications, voice-over-Internet-protocol communications, voice-over-digital-subscriber-line communications, video-over-data communications, video-over-Internet-protocol communications, and video-over-digital-subscriber-line communications | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 3, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Netergy Microelectronics, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Netergy Microelectronics, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Netergy Microelectronics, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named NETERGY MICROELECTRONICS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 18, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 26, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 15, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |