USPTO serial 76332750
MARELLA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DAHLING, KRISTIN M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MARELLA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
42100 Reggio Emilia, IT
42100 Reggio Emilia, IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael A. Grow
MICHAEL A GROW ARENT FOX KINTNER PLOTKIN AND KAHN, PLLC1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036-5303UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | licensing of intellectual property rights namely, licensing of trademarks displayed on store signs in connection with retail stores in the field of fashion; licensing of trade dress embodied in designs relating to layouts, decors and decorations, both interior and exterior, for retail stores in the field of fashion; licensing of copyrights for advertising, marketing, promotional and publicity materials including for photographs used in connection with retail stores in the field of fashion | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 7, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 7, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 19, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 21, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 5, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 5, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 25, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 16, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 6, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 10, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 4, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 15, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 27, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 20, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 29, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |