USPTO serial 76332874
FUTURE BEEF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COREA, ANDY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FUTURE BEEF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Chad S. Hilyard, Esq.
CHAD S HILYARD ESQ2 EMBARCADERO CTR FL 8SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3833UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | BEEF, BEEF PRODUCTS, AND BEEF BY-PRODUCTS; LEATHER SOLD IN BULK; ANIMAL HIDES; PET PRODUCTS; DOG TREATS; DOG RAWHIDE CHEWS; FOOD CASINGS; CATTLE; MEAT AND PREPARED MEAT PRODUCTS; ANIMAL BREEDING; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; SLAUGHTERING OF ANIMALS; EDUCATION IN THE FIELD OF ANIMAL BREEDING AND ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; DATA PROCESSING IN THE FILED OF ANIMAL CHARACTERISTICS, ANIMAL CARCASS CHARACTERISTICS, ANIMAL GROWTH, ANIMAL BREEDING, ANIMAL HUSBANDRY AND ANIMAL GENETICS; ANIMAL GENEALOGY RESEARCH; COMPUTER INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL IN THE FIELD OF ANIMAL CHARACTERISTICS, ANIMAL CARCASS CHARACTERISTICS, ANIMAL GROWTH, ANIMAL BREEDING, ANIMAL HUSBANDRY AND ANIMAL GENETICS; LIVESTOCK MANAGEMENT; BUSINESS MANAGEMENT AND CONSULTATION IN THE FIELD OF ANIMAL BREEDING AND ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; LICENSING OF TECHNOLOGY TO OTHERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 11, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |