Drawing for Serial No. 76333011

USPTO serial 76333011

Serial No. 76333011

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BAIRD, MICHAEL
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 76333011?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

BARBARA KOLSUN

BARBARA KOLSUN SEVEN FOR ALL MANKIND LLC25 W 39TH ST 13TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10018UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025t-shirts, vests, jerseys, sweatshirts, sweaters, coats and raincoats and headwear, namely caps and hatsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 23, 2008CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Dec 19, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 6, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 14, 2006EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 14, 2006EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Dec 14, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 29, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 21, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 15, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 15, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 15, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 16, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 6, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 15, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 15, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 15, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 23, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 31, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 31, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 6, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 10, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 10, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 6, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 17, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 30, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 30, 2004AAUDAMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED—
Jan 13, 2004ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 23, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 23, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 19, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 19, 20031.ADSEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED—
Jun 20, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 28, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 22, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 19, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 27, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 19, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 10, 2002AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 8, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 30, 2002DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 30, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 29, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 29, 2002DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jul 29, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 11, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 15, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 27, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 7, 2002IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jan 24, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 9, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance