USPTO serial 76333186
DYNA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DYNA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Friedrich Kueffner
342 MADISON AVE STE 1921NEW YORK, NY 10173UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | REINFORCING ELEMENTS OF STEEL FOR REINFORCED CONCRETE, STEEL TENSION MEMBERS FOR STAY CABLES AND PRESTRESSED CONCRETE CONSISTING OF BARS, WIRES OR STRANDS, ANCHORING ELEMENTS THEREFOR, NAMELY ANCHOR BODIES, SOCKETS, WEDGE PLATES, WEDGES, NUTS, COUPLERS, SHIMS, SLEEVES, METAL DUCTS AND SHEATHINGS | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | HYDRAULIC JACKS, MACHINES FOR STRAIGHTENING, BENDING, INSTALLING AND TENSIONING STEEL BARS AND STRANDS; MACHINES FOR CUTTING OR ROLLING THREADS ON REINFORCING ELEMENTS; MECHANICAL APPARATUS FOR TREATMENT AND INJECTION OF CORROSION PROTECTIVE AND/OR BONDING SUBSTANCES, NAMELY WAXES, SYNTHETIC RESIN, SYNTHETIC RESIN-BASED MORTAR AND CEMENT MORTAR | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | CEMENTITOUS GROUT MADE OF CEMENT AND ADDITIVES AS A FILLER FOR STAY CABLES AND PRESTRESSING AND ANCHORING TENDONS | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | STRUCTURAL AND CIVIL CONSTRUCTION WORKS, IN PARTICULAR BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION, ERECTING SCAFFOLDINGS, ASSEMBLY AND INSTALLATION OF TENSION MEMBERS, IN PARTICULAR FOR SUSPENSION BRIDGES AND CABLE-STAYED BRIDGES, INSTALLING REINFORCEMENT AND TENSION MEMBERS AS WELL AS PRESTRESSING TENDONS FOR REINFORCED AND/OR PRESTRESSED CONCRETE STRUCTURES; RENTAL OF MACHINES, TOOLS AND APPARATUS FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES; CONSULTING SERVICES IN CONNECTION WITH STRUCTURAL AND CIVIL CONSTRUCTION WORKS; CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND SUPERVISION | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | ARCHITECTURAL, STRUCTURAL AND CIVIL ENGINEERING AND CONSULTING SERVICES AND QUALITY ASSURANCE SERVICES THEREFOR; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING FOR OTHERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Walter Bau-Aktiengesellschaft
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named DYNA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 26, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 5, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 19, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2002 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 25, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |