Drawing for DIVERSITY DRIVERS

USPTO serial 76333236

DIVERSITY DRIVERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIVERSITY DRIVERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Caroline C. Smith

CAROLINE C SMITH SHAW PITTMAN LLP2300 N ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20037-1128UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016MONTHLY PUBLICATION IN THE NATURE OF A NEWSLETTER CONCERNING DIVERSITY ISSUES RELEVANT TO THE AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRYACTIVE—
035EMPLOYMENT CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY, NAMELY CONSULTING ON THE ISSUE OF DIVERSITY IN THE WORKPLACE; AND CAREER PLACEMENT SERVICESACTIVE—
041EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY PROVIDING CLASSES, WORKSHOPS AND SEMINARS IN THE FIELD OF EMPLOYMENT DIVERSITY ISSUES FOR EXECUTIVES IN THE AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY; CAREER COUNSELING FOR EXECUTIVES IN THE AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY; AND CAREER TRAINING SERVICES, NAMELY PROVIDING TRAINING ON DIVERSITY ISSUES FOR EXECUTIVES IN THE AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRYACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 25, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 25, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 22, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 22, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 22, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 3, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 18, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 18, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 8, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 8, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 16, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Nov 16, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 23, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 1, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 29, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 22, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 22, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 23, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 1, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 11, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 24, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 21, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 21, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 23, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 29, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 29, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 10, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance