Drawing for RUNCOM

USPTO serial 76333286

RUNCOM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMPSON, LAVERNE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RUNCOM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey H. Greger

JEFFREY H GREGER LOWE HAUPTMAN GILMAN & BERNER1700 DIAGONAL RD STE 310ALEXANDRIA, VA 22202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009apparatus and instruments for the surveying and location of terrestrial features and structures, for the location of pipelines, and for the detection and location of defects in pipelines; computer programs for use in the management and manipulation of data collected from the aforesaid apparatus and instruments, and for the production of reports from such data and from related aerial and satellite imaging of terrestrial features and structuresACTIVE—
037repair and maintenance of pipelines and consulting services for inspection, repair and maintenance of pipelinesACTIVE—
042inspection of pipelines; surveying, mapping, and locating terrestrial features and structuresACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 15, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 25, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 14, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 14, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 18, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 26, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 6, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 1, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 29, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 29, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 25, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance