Drawing for INFUSE-X

USPTO serial 76333309

INFUSE-X

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with INFUSE-X?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Glenn A. Gundersen

GLENN A GUNDERSEN DECHERT4000 BELL ATLANTIC TWR1717 ARCH STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2793

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Laboratory, and manufacturing equipment for use in developing and manufacturing pharmaceuticals, nutraceuticals, chemicals, proteins, peptides, oligonucleotides, DNA, and vaccines using supercritical fluid technologyACTIVE—
040Custom manufacturing of pharmaceuticals, nutraceuticals, chemicals, proteins, peptides, oligonucleotides, DNA, and vaccines using supercritical fluid technology to the order and/or specification of othersACTIVE—
042Conducting feasibility studies for others on the use of supercritical fluids in the formulation of pharmaceuticals, nutraceuticals chemicals, proteins, peptides oligonucleotides, DNA, vaccines, other biotechnology-derived products, and other products; licensing of supercritical fluid technology; developing pharmaceuticals, nutraceuticals, chemicals, proteins, peptides, oligonucleotides, DNA, vaccines, other biotechnology-derived products, and other products for others using supercritical fluid technologyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 16, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 16, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 20, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 27, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 8, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 2, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 13, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 13, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 12, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 11, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 29, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 25, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance