USPTO serial 76333497
SOHODVR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SOHODVR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Osan-ri, Kyunggi-do, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Burton S. Ehrlich
BURTON S EHRLICH LADAS & PARRY LLP224 S MICHIGAN AVE STE 1200CHICAGO, IL 60604-2592UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Burglar alarms; computer memories; closed circuits for Digital Video Recorder (DVR) | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Maintenance services of computer hardware; burglar alarm installation services | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Electronic data transmission services; video conferencing services over telecommunications networks; electronic transmission of messages and images via computer terminal | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 9, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 8, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 10, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 13, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 13, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 30, 2013 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 17, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 30, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 28, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 20, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 12, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 12, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 27, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 8, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 7, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 17, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 7, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 16, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 22, 2004 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 19, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 14, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 28, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |