USPTO serial 76333586
PROCARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, RONALD G
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PROCARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Medical apparatus, namely, lancets and lancing devices; adjustable depth safety lancets; devices for urological care, namely, Foley catheters, urethral catheters, urethral catheterization tray, urine drainage bags, suction catheters, suction catheter kits, single suction catheters, catheterization trays, Foley catheterization trays, Foley catheter plug, specimen cups, catheter strips, extension tubes and irrigation trays; pole bags and pole kits; devices for injections, namely, syringes; and devices for investigating body cavities, namely, tracheotomy device and basic tray contents for tracheotomy, enteral irrigation device; vaginal speculum and vaginal speculum kit | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 24, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 31, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 15, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 19, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2003 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| May 14, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 18, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 19, 2003 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 22, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 10, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 2, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |