Drawing for PETS ARE KIDS TOO

USPTO serial 76333634

PETS ARE KIDS TOO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COGGINS, ROBERT H
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PETS ARE KIDS TOO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gary H. Levin

LAURA GENOVESE MILLER COZEN O'CONNOR1900 MARKET STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016plastic trash bags for pet wasteACTIVE—
020pet beds; pet seatsACTIVE—
021pet feeding bottles, bowls and plates; toothbrushes for pets; cages for petsACTIVE—
028pet toys; pet exercise wheelsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 22, 2004MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 22, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 26, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jan 12, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 15, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 15, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 9, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 30, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 30, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 17, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 30, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 30, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 9, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 7, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 17, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 12, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 8, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance