Drawing for LOST CONTINENTS

USPTO serial 76333638

LOST CONTINENTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
Law office
INTENT TO USE UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LOST CONTINENTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kathleen S. Herbert

KATHLEEN S HERBERT CHRISMAN, BYNUM & JOHNSON, PC1900 FIFTEENTH STBOULDER, CO 80302UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR THE OPERATION OF MULTI-PLAYER, INTERACTIVE GAMES PLAYED OVER COMPUTER NETWORKS, GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS AND PERSONAL COMPUTERS AND VIDEO GAME CONSOLES OR TOP SET DEVICESACTIVE—
041ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY PROVIDING A MULTI PLAYER, INTERACTIVE COMPUTER GAME THAT IS ACCESSED NETWORK-WIDE OVER COMPUTER NETWORKS, GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS AND PERSONAL COMPUTERS AND VIDEO GAME CONSOLES OR TOP SET DEVICESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 11, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 11, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 9, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 30, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 30, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 30, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 18, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 18, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 18, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 8, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 8, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 6, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 18, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 26, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 6, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 13, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 22, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 22, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 1, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 19, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 22, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 15, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 25, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance