Drawing for JANIE AND JACK

USPTO serial 76333654

JANIE AND JACK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MEIER, SHARON A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JANIE AND JACK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Antonio R. Sarabia II

BETH M GOLDMAN HELLER EHRMAN WHITE & MCAULIFFE LLP333 BUSH STSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104-2878UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Pre-recorded audio cassettes, compact discs and audio tapes featuring music; prerecorded video tapes and video discs featuring children's entertainment and educational programs; computer game software; and cassette tape playersACTIVE—
011Lamps; lamp shades; and electric night lightsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 3, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 3, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 17, 2004COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Nov 4, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 26, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 26, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 24, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 24, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 17, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 17, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 17, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 7, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 29, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 29, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 20, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 11, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 2003DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 23, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 30, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 30, 2003DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Apr 30, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 19, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 27, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 7, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 4, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 3, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 3, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 27, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 29, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 25, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance