USPTO serial 76333692
NANOVOLUME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2887897Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 21, 2004
- Examiner
- MEIER, SHARON A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NANOVOLUME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James E. Hudson III
James E. Hudson III Crain, Caton & James, P.C.1401 McKinneySuite 1700Houston, TX 77010-4035Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Laboratory equipment, namely chromatography injectors and switching valves | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2009 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| May 6, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 1, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 20, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 1, 2004 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 25, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 8, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2004 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 6, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 15, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 28, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |