Drawing for Serial No. 76333791

USPTO serial 76333791

Serial No. 76333791

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MEIER, SHARON A
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 76333791?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert B. G. Horowitz

Robert B. G. Horowitz Baker & Hostetler LLP45 Rockefeller PlazaNew York, NY 10111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Video cameras; video cameras combined with video tape recorders/players; video tape recorders/players; computer software for editing video images; editing, encoding and decoding system of digital versatile discs comprised of personal computers, circuit boards and applications software; computer software for the display of video data on display monitors of personal computers and video game displays; computer software for the display of video data on personal computers; and computer software for the display of video data on video game displays; pre-recorded digital versatile discs featuring movies, musical performances and video gamesACTIVE—
038streaming and delivery of video images via global computer networksACTIVE—
040Video editing; duplication of digital versatile discs for othersACTIVE—
041Video production services; rental of video cameras, video cameras combined with video tape recorders and players, video tape recorders and playersACTIVE—
042Rental of personal computers and computer software, namely, software for editing video images, for editing, encoding and decoding digital versatile discs, for viewing video images on display monitors of personal computers, for viewing video images on display monitors of video games, and for viewing video images on display monitors of personal computers and video gamesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 19, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 19, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 24, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 12, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 28, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 25, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 11, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 17, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 27, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 18, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 10, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 9, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 9, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 7, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 8, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 25, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance