USPTO serial 76333982
ROAD GEAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRASER, RICHARD
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ROAD GEAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Beaverton, OR
BEAVERTON, OR
Arcata, CA
Arcata, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Noel M Cook
NOEL M COOK OWEN, WICKERSHAM & ERICKSON PC455 MARKET ST STE 1910SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | ALL-PURPOSE AUTOMOBILE RACKS AND RELATED EQUIPMENT, NAMELY AUTOMOBILE RACKS FOR ALL TYPES OF SPORTS EQUIPMENT, INCLUDING BICYCLES, SKIS, SAILBOARDS, SURFBOARDS, CANOES, KAYAKS AND SMALL BOATS; VEHICLE LUGGAGE RACKS, VEHICLE LUMBER AND HOME FURNISHING RACKS; AND EQUIPMENT RELATED TO AUTO RACKS THAT IS SOLD AS A UNIT, NAMELY AUTO RACK ROOF PADS, FOOT BRACES, ANTI-THEFT LOCKS, SECURITY CABLES, AND MOUNTING PADS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by WATERMARK PADDLESPORTS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by YAKIMA PRODUCTS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Yakima Products, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Yakima Products, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named ROAD GEAR
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 13, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 13, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 1, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 8, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 7, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 5, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 11, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 15, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 1, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 24, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 8, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 8, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 8, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 15, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 26, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 20, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 31, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 25, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |