USPTO serial 76334198
YES YOUTH ENHANCEMENT SYSTEMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with YES YOUTH ENHANCEMENT SYSTEMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Miami Shores, FL
Miami Shores, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JORGE ESPINOSA
RONNY J HALPERIN ESQ RONNY J HALPERIN PA312 SE 17TH ST 2ND FLFORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33316UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | HEALTH AND BEAUTY KIT CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF FACE CREAMS, BEAUTY MASKS, AND COSMETICS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 3, 2006 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| May 24, 2006 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 21, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 21, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 12, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 26, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 9, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 22, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 1, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 13, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 14, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 22, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 2, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |