USPTO serial 76334277
NOPE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHHINA, KARANENDRA S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NOPE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario M8X 2S9, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bruce A. Tassan
BRUCE A TASSAN4143 N 27TH STARLINGTON, VA 22207-5211UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | CHOCOLATES, CANDY AND CHOCOLATE BARS, CHOCOLATE TRUFFLES, CANDY, AND CONFECTIONERY AND OTHER SWEETS, NAMELY, GRANOLA BASED SNACK BARS, RICE-BASED SNACK FOODS, WHEAT-BASED SNACK FOODS, CHEESE-FLAVORED PUFFED CORN SNACKS, NAMELY, CHEESE CURLS AND CHEESE BALLS, PUFFED CORN SNACKS, CHOCOLATE-BASED READY-TO-EAT FOOD BARS, READY-TO-EAT CEREAL DERIVED FOOD BARS, CANDY COATED POPCORN, CHOCOLATE FOOD BEVERAGES NOT BEING DAIRY OR VEGETABLE BASED, COCOA-BASED INGREDIENT IN CONFECTIONARY PRODUCTS, CHOCOLATE SYRUP, CHOCOLATE FONDUE, CHOCOLATE TOPPING, HOT CHOCOLATE, CONFECTIONARY CHIPS FOR BAKING, CANDY MINTS, PASTRIES, AND COOKIES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 14, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 3, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 26, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 2, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |