Drawing for NEWPORT RAINGEAR

USPTO serial 76334833

NEWPORT RAINGEAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NEWPORT RAINGEAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Douglas Panzer

Douglas Panzer ROYER COOPER COHEN BRAUNFELD101 West Elm StreetSuite 400Conshohocken, PA 19428

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018UMBRELLASACTIVE—
025RAINGEAR, NAMELY, RAIN-RESISTANT PONCHOSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 31, 2025TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 31, 2025ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 31, 2025REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 7, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 7, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 4, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2004EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Mar 17, 2004CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jun 13, 2003CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
May 29, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 29, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 29, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 20, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 9, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 9, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 9, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 7, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 1, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 1, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 29, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 28, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance