USPTO serial 76334848
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ERICA K DORAN
ERICA K DORAN LAW OFFICE OF ERICA DORAN42 CHURCH STSYOSSET, NY 11791UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | PERFUMES, COSMETICS, AND SKIN TREATMENTS, NAMELY, SKIN CLEANSERS, SKIN TONERS, SKIN MOISTURIZERS, SKIN ENHANCEMENT TREATMENTS, NAMELY, CREAMS, GELS, LOTIONS, SCRUBS AND NON-MEDICATED SERUMS; SKIN CREAMS, SKIN LOTIONS, FACIAL MASKS, SKIN CAMOUFLAGE TREATMENTS, NAMELY, CREAMS, GELS, LOTIONS, SCRUBS AND NON-MEDICATED SERUMS; NON-MEDICATED ACNE TREATMENTS, NAMELY, CREAMS, GELS, LOTIONS, SCRUBS AND NON-MEDICATED SERUMS; EYE TREATMENTS, NAMELY, EYE CREAMS, EYE GELS, EYE SHADOWS, EYE PENCILS, EYEBROW PENCILS, MASCARA, CONCEALERS, EYEBROW POWDERS, EYE LASHES, EYE LINER POWDERS, EYE LINER LIQUIDS, LIP TREATMENTS, NAMELY, LIPSTICK, NON-MEDICATED LIP BALM, LIP PENCILS, LIP GLOSS; SKIN FOUNDATIONS; FACE POWDERS; BLUSHES, BLEACH CREAMS FOR THE SKIN; BODY BATH PRODUCTS, NAMELY BODY CLEANSERS, HAND CREAMS, BODY MOISTURIZERS, BODY OILS; NAIL CREAMS, GELS, AND NON-MEDICATED SERUMS; FOOT CREAMS, GELS, SCRUBS, AND NON-MEDICATED SERUMS; | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 3, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 5, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 11, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |