Drawing for DESTROYER

USPTO serial 76334936

DESTROYER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ALI, STEPHANIE MARIE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DESTROYER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William H. Cox

WILLIAM H COX JANVEY, GORDON, HERLANDS, RANDOLPH ET AL355 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Prerecorded audio and video tapes, motion picture films, phonographic records, compact discs, laser discs, audio video discs, audio video tapes, audio video cassettes and dvd discs featuring animated programs and musicACTIVE—
016Comic books, general feature magazines, photographs, posters and souvenir booksACTIVE—
025Clothing, namely shirts, vests, sweaters, shoes, caps, bandannas, shorts, sweatshirts, pants, belts for clothing, socks, swimwear, rainwear, blouses, dresses, footwear, hosiery, scarves, hats, head bands, pajamas, underwear and sleepwearACTIVE—
041Entertainment services, namely production of television programs, on-going television and on-line animated programs, and the production and distribution of motion picturesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 6, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 6, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 19, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 27, 2006ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Jul 12, 2006ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jun 13, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 24, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 21, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 7, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 29, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 23, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 7, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 7, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 9, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 4, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 15, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 27, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 14, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 3, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 12, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 12, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 8, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 8, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 30, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance