Drawing for D-LIFT

USPTO serial 76334939

D-LIFT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OH, WON TEAK
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with D-LIFT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Abelman

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB150 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017-5612UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007MATERIAL HANDLING AND LIFTING EQUIPMENT, AND REPLACEMENT PARTS THEREFOR, NAMELY, ELECTRIC HOISTS, CRANES, MANIPULATORS, CONVEYORS, ELECTRIC DRIVES AND GEARSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 15, 2003ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jun 9, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 9, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 20, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 6, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 7, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 7, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 16, 2002CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 9, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 7, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 11, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 11, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 9, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 9, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 4, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 26, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 24, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance