CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for BIZON

USPTO serial 76334940

BIZON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 604
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with BIZON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark B Harrison

MARK B HARRISON VENABLE LLPPO BOX 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Mineral food-supplementsABANDONED—
032Mineral water, mineral water of anti-hangover effect, preparations for making aerated water, preparations for making aerated water with anti-hangover effect, preparations for making mineral water, preparations for making mineral water with anti-hangover effectABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 1, 2011MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Nov 1, 2011ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Nov 1, 2011OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Nov 1, 2011OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jul 18, 2011OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Feb 17, 2011ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jan 18, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 18, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 13, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 9, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 22, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 22, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 22, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 22, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 23, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 23, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 23, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 1, 2010RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 1, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 1, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 1, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 31, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 30, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 28, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 27, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 19, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 17, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 17, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 31, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 28, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 23, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 25, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 22, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 17, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 28, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 9, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 31, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 31, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 4, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 7, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance