USPTO serial 76335059
DUREX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LE, KHANH M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DUREX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
S. C. Yuter
S C YUTER407 CEDAR DR WBRIARCLIFF MANOR, NY 10510UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Asphalt and elastomeric coatings and cements, all for roofing, waterproofing and dampproofing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 2004 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 3, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 11, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 19, 2004 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 13, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 12, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 9, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 9, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 27, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |