USPTO serial 76335229
THERM-A-PAD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THERM-A-PAD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph L. Strabala
JOSEPH L STRABALA LAW OFFICE OF JOSEPH L STRABALAONE EMBARCADERO CTR STE 1020SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3600UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 004 | Non-chemical silicon rubber treatments for thermal management of computer parts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2009 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 2, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Apr 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 16, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 9, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 25, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 5, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 16, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 29, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |