Drawing for ALTRIA - WHERE PEOPLE AND PERFORMANCE MAKE A DIFFERENCE

USPTO serial 76335240

ALTRIA - WHERE PEOPLE AND PERFORMANCE MAKE A DIFFERENCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DAWE III, WILLIAM H
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ALTRIA - WHERE PEOPLE AND PERFORMANCE MAKE A DIFFERENCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert J. Eck

ROBERT J ECK C/O PHILIP MORRIS MANAGEMENT CORP800 WESTCHESTER AVE 6NRYE BROOK, NY 10573-1301UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035CONDUCTING APPLICANTS SHAREHOLDER AND INVESTOR RELATIONS, NAMELY PROVIDING SHAREHOLDER RECORD KEEPING AND CORPORATE INFORMATION AND ANALYSISACTIVE—
036ADMINISTRATION OF EMPLOYEE BENEFIT AND PENSION PLANS, NAMELY DIVIDEND REINVESTMENT PLAN, RETIREMENT PLAN, DEFERRED PROFIT-SHARING PLAN, FLEXIBLE SPENDING ACCOUNTS FOR DEPENDENT CARE AND/OR HEALTH CARE, GROUP LIFE INSURANCE COVERAGE AND STOCK OPTION PROGRAM; PROVIDING GRANTS TO CHARITIES AND CHARITABLE GROUPS IN THE FIELD OF HUNGER, DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, CULTURE AND THE ARTS, AIDS, HUMANITARIAN AID, ENVIRONMENT, AGRICULTURE, CULTURAL DIVERSITY; FINANCIAL SPONSORSHIP OF CULTURAL EVENTS, NAMELY VISUAL ARTS, DANCE, THEATERACTIVE—
042CHARITABLE AND PHILANTHROPIC SERVICES, NAMELY PROVIDING FOOD, CLOTHING, SHELTERACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 27, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 27, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 18, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 23, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 6, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 19, 2003ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jul 29, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 9, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 11, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 18, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 18, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 18, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 10, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 22, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 25, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 25, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 14, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance